Last year, Jada Pinkett Smith had made headlines after Will Smith’s former friend, Bilaal Salaam, had filed a lawsuit against his wife worth USD 3 million dollars. Now, months later, the online personality and actress Jada Smith is stating the matter and completely dismissing all of the statements that have been made by Salaam. Read more to find out what she had to say.
Jada Pinkett Smith opens up about Bilaal Salaam’s USD 3 million lawsuit against her
This month, as per recent reports shared by TMZ, the ‘The Matrix Reloaded’ star filed a motion for the lawsuit against her to be dismissed. She officially refuted all of the claims that had been made by the musician and cited that they were all absurd. In a statement included in the report, Pinkett alleged that all of the claims made in the lawsuit are “false, uncorroborated, and made to generate attention as part of an ongoing public campaign of harassment directed at (her).” Not only that, but she also made claims that Bilaal had a “fixation” on the Smith family and that the incident that he is referring to from 2021 never involved him in the first place.
About Bilaal Salaam’s lawsuit against Jada Pinkett Smith
The lawsuit, which was filed against the actress in November last year, alleged that she confronted Bilaal during a ‘Men in Black’ promotional party in 2021. The part mentioned in the legal documents refers to the one held at the Regency Calabasas Common on September 25, 2021.A statement about the incident read, “While in the lobby, Jada Pinkett Smith approached Plaintiff with approximately seven members of her entourage, became verbally aggressive, and threatened Plaintiff by stating that if he continued ‘telling her personal business,’ he would ‘end up missing or catch a bullet,’ and demanded he sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) ‘or else.’” They also made claims that Pinkett had also launched a targeted campaign against the musician to tarnish his image. Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing as reported by a third-party source. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, and a final verdict has not been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.
